<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tamron 17-50mm Front Focus</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.randomprocess.ca/2008/12/09/tamron-17-50mm-front-focus/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.randomprocess.ca/2008/12/09/tamron-17-50mm-front-focus/</link>
	<description>NOT just another WordPress weblog. What were they thinking when they came up with that tagline anyways?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 13:45:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg</title>
		<link>http://www.randomprocess.ca/2008/12/09/tamron-17-50mm-front-focus/#comment-6858</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 18:51:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.randomprocess.ca/?p=1090#comment-6858</guid>
		<description>I have the 17-50mm as well, and mine seems to have the front focus problem.  Did you manage to get yours fixed?  Did it take a long time?  Where did you have to send it in to?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have the 17-50mm as well, and mine seems to have the front focus problem.  Did you manage to get yours fixed?  Did it take a long time?  Where did you have to send it in to?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: charlie</title>
		<link>http://www.randomprocess.ca/2008/12/09/tamron-17-50mm-front-focus/#comment-6050</link>
		<dc:creator>charlie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 04:31:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.randomprocess.ca/?p=1090#comment-6050</guid>
		<description>Haven&#039;t had a chance to send it in yet. I&#039;m making do with it for the moment. Further reading on the subject seems to indicate the first version without the in-lens motor performs much better from an focus point of view.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Haven&#8217;t had a chance to send it in yet. I&#8217;m making do with it for the moment. Further reading on the subject seems to indicate the first version without the in-lens motor performs much better from an focus point of view.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ML</title>
		<link>http://www.randomprocess.ca/2008/12/09/tamron-17-50mm-front-focus/#comment-6036</link>
		<dc:creator>ML</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 18:13:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.randomprocess.ca/?p=1090#comment-6036</guid>
		<description>Did you get it fixed?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did you get it fixed?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: charlie</title>
		<link>http://www.randomprocess.ca/2008/12/09/tamron-17-50mm-front-focus/#comment-5516</link>
		<dc:creator>charlie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 22:58:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.randomprocess.ca/?p=1090#comment-5516</guid>
		<description>I figure if it was the camera front-focusing, even when manual focusing and the focused &#039;dot&#039; appears for the 50mm prime, it should be slightly out of focus, but it isn&#039;t.

Hence, I believe it to be the lens. As for aperture, the front-focusing much less obvious with a smaller aperture, but I think that has more to do with the fact that the DoF is larger, thus reducing the effect of the front-focus, not eliminating it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I figure if it was the camera front-focusing, even when manual focusing and the focused &#8216;dot&#8217; appears for the 50mm prime, it should be slightly out of focus, but it isn&#8217;t.</p>
<p>Hence, I believe it to be the lens. As for aperture, the front-focusing much less obvious with a smaller aperture, but I think that has more to do with the fact that the DoF is larger, thus reducing the effect of the front-focus, not eliminating it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cuong</title>
		<link>http://www.randomprocess.ca/2008/12/09/tamron-17-50mm-front-focus/#comment-5515</link>
		<dc:creator>Cuong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 11:33:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.randomprocess.ca/?p=1090#comment-5515</guid>
		<description>And one more thing, I heard that the front focus issue only appears with max aperture. Maybe it doesn&#039;t happen with smaller aperture.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And one more thing, I heard that the front focus issue only appears with max aperture. Maybe it doesn&#8217;t happen with smaller aperture.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cuong</title>
		<link>http://www.randomprocess.ca/2008/12/09/tamron-17-50mm-front-focus/#comment-5514</link>
		<dc:creator>Cuong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 11:31:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.randomprocess.ca/?p=1090#comment-5514</guid>
		<description>I meant that if D40 cannot autofocus on 50 f/1.8, how comes you knew that it does not have that issue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I meant that if D40 cannot autofocus on 50 f/1.8, how comes you knew that it does not have that issue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: charlie</title>
		<link>http://www.randomprocess.ca/2008/12/09/tamron-17-50mm-front-focus/#comment-5506</link>
		<dc:creator>charlie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jan 2009 17:28:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.randomprocess.ca/?p=1090#comment-5506</guid>
		<description>The D40 doesn&#039;t have any focus micro-adjustment capabilities like the D300 and above so there&#039;s little possibility of fixing the issue without getting it calibrated. You could see if the store you purchased the lens at has the ability to do a calibration.

As for the 50mm, I stated that it &lt;strong&gt;does not&lt;/strong&gt; exhibit any front focus issues.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The D40 doesn&#8217;t have any focus micro-adjustment capabilities like the D300 and above so there&#8217;s little possibility of fixing the issue without getting it calibrated. You could see if the store you purchased the lens at has the ability to do a calibration.</p>
<p>As for the 50mm, I stated that it <strong>does not</strong> exhibit any front focus issues.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cuong</title>
		<link>http://www.randomprocess.ca/2008/12/09/tamron-17-50mm-front-focus/#comment-5505</link>
		<dc:creator>Cuong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jan 2009 16:37:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.randomprocess.ca/?p=1090#comment-5505</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve got the D40 and Tamron 17-50mm like you have. Mine seems to be in the same situation as yours. I want to know whether there is a way to solve this problem without changing to another one.
One more thing, as you said on the other entry, you&#039;re using D40 and cannot autofocus on 50 f/1.8. So how comes can the 50 exhibit the same issue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve got the D40 and Tamron 17-50mm like you have. Mine seems to be in the same situation as yours. I want to know whether there is a way to solve this problem without changing to another one.<br />
One more thing, as you said on the other entry, you&#8217;re using D40 and cannot autofocus on 50 f/1.8. So how comes can the 50 exhibit the same issue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

