<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Replacing a 5G (Video) iPod</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.randomprocess.ca/2007/11/24/replacing-a-5g-video-ipod/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.randomprocess.ca/2007/11/24/replacing-a-5g-video-ipod/</link>
	<description>NOT just another WordPress weblog. What were they thinking when they came up with that tagline anyways?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 13:45:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Samsung YP-P2 8GB MP3 Player Review &#187; random process &#124; charlie 2.0</title>
		<link>http://www.randomprocess.ca/2007/11/24/replacing-a-5g-video-ipod/#comment-3235</link>
		<dc:creator>Samsung YP-P2 8GB MP3 Player Review &#187; random process &#124; charlie 2.0</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2008 00:03:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.randomprocess.ca/2007/11/24/replacing-a-5g-video-ipod/#comment-3235</guid>
		<description>[...] set out over a month ago to find an MP3 player that could replace my 5G iPod Video. It was rarely used, sitting on my desk gathering dust. It was too bulky and fragile. Apple [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] set out over a month ago to find an MP3 player that could replace my 5G iPod Video. It was rarely used, sitting on my desk gathering dust. It was too bulky and fragile. Apple [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Samsung YP-P2 8GB MP3 Player First Impressions &#187; random process &#124; charlie 2.0</title>
		<link>http://www.randomprocess.ca/2007/11/24/replacing-a-5g-video-ipod/#comment-2998</link>
		<dc:creator>Samsung YP-P2 8GB MP3 Player First Impressions &#187; random process &#124; charlie 2.0</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 05:21:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.randomprocess.ca/2007/11/24/replacing-a-5g-video-ipod/#comment-2998</guid>
		<description>[...] spoke a few days ago about replacing my current MP3 player, a 5th Gen iPod (Video). At the time, I was trying to mainly decide between the Samsung P2 and the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] spoke a few days ago about replacing my current MP3 player, a 5th Gen iPod (Video). At the time, I was trying to mainly decide between the Samsung P2 and the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: charlie</title>
		<link>http://www.randomprocess.ca/2007/11/24/replacing-a-5g-video-ipod/#comment-2993</link>
		<dc:creator>charlie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 04:38:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.randomprocess.ca/2007/11/24/replacing-a-5g-video-ipod/#comment-2993</guid>
		<description>I did take a look at the 2nd Gen Clix, but couldn&#039;t really find a place to buy it that I felt comfortable with (found it at one place online?). I watched some videos of it and while the interface looked quite slick, I wasn&#039;t too sure how I liked the whole-device-as-a-button idea.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I did take a look at the 2nd Gen Clix, but couldn&#8217;t really find a place to buy it that I felt comfortable with (found it at one place online?). I watched some videos of it and while the interface looked quite slick, I wasn&#8217;t too sure how I liked the whole-device-as-a-button idea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thusenth</title>
		<link>http://www.randomprocess.ca/2007/11/24/replacing-a-5g-video-ipod/#comment-2967</link>
		<dc:creator>Thusenth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Nov 2007 04:40:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.randomprocess.ca/2007/11/24/replacing-a-5g-video-ipod/#comment-2967</guid>
		<description>The Nano isn&#039;t ugly in my opinion but ergonomically it&#039;s awkward.  

One that you should definitely check out is the iRiver Clix (gen 2).  Overall, it&#039;s gotten some really good reviews and is pretty innovative from a button standpoint.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Nano isn&#8217;t ugly in my opinion but ergonomically it&#8217;s awkward.  </p>
<p>One that you should definitely check out is the iRiver Clix (gen 2).  Overall, it&#8217;s gotten some really good reviews and is pretty innovative from a button standpoint.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: charlie</title>
		<link>http://www.randomprocess.ca/2007/11/24/replacing-a-5g-video-ipod/#comment-2958</link>
		<dc:creator>charlie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Nov 2007 21:13:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.randomprocess.ca/2007/11/24/replacing-a-5g-video-ipod/#comment-2958</guid>
		<description>In my opinion, the nano is ugly. There&#039;s something wrong with its proportions. I had a chance to play with it a bit at an Apple store, and it definitely doesn&#039;t sway the opinion that I got from photos. Video capability is nice, but on a 2&quot; screen? I can&#039;t even stand it on the 2.5&quot; of the iPod Video. Oh, and that&#039;s not mentioning gunking up the UI - why add frivolous images in the menus and slow down the device&#039;s speed? Leave the eye candy to the Touch or jack up the speed of the processor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In my opinion, the nano is ugly. There&#8217;s something wrong with its proportions. I had a chance to play with it a bit at an Apple store, and it definitely doesn&#8217;t sway the opinion that I got from photos. Video capability is nice, but on a 2&#8243; screen? I can&#8217;t even stand it on the 2.5&#8243; of the iPod Video. Oh, and that&#8217;s not mentioning gunking up the UI &#8211; why add frivolous images in the menus and slow down the device&#8217;s speed? Leave the eye candy to the Touch or jack up the speed of the processor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jojopotato</title>
		<link>http://www.randomprocess.ca/2007/11/24/replacing-a-5g-video-ipod/#comment-2957</link>
		<dc:creator>jojopotato</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Nov 2007 19:07:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.randomprocess.ca/2007/11/24/replacing-a-5g-video-ipod/#comment-2957</guid>
		<description>There are many players to choose from on the market. 
Nano is nice for the person who only wants 250 songs, but is real small and my friends seem to lose them.
Samsung would be my choice for something other than iPod.
Now you have to find the best price for your new purchase, also you can buy used or refurbished to save some money.
Don&#039;t forget what color you want!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are many players to choose from on the market.<br />
Nano is nice for the person who only wants 250 songs, but is real small and my friends seem to lose them.<br />
Samsung would be my choice for something other than iPod.<br />
Now you have to find the best price for your new purchase, also you can buy used or refurbished to save some money.<br />
Don&#8217;t forget what color you want!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rene</title>
		<link>http://www.randomprocess.ca/2007/11/24/replacing-a-5g-video-ipod/#comment-2949</link>
		<dc:creator>Rene</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Nov 2007 07:32:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.randomprocess.ca/2007/11/24/replacing-a-5g-video-ipod/#comment-2949</guid>
		<description>The nano is not ugly. After seeing (several) of them in person and getting to play with more than a few of them, I have to say that I think it&#039;s diminutive size is absolutely sexy. If anything, it makes me wonder why they chose to make the 1G and 2G nanos so long and gross. Plus it&#039;s not really barebones since it has video functionality....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The nano is not ugly. After seeing (several) of them in person and getting to play with more than a few of them, I have to say that I think it&#8217;s diminutive size is absolutely sexy. If anything, it makes me wonder why they chose to make the 1G and 2G nanos so long and gross. Plus it&#8217;s not really barebones since it has video functionality&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

