<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Finally a Semi-Good Apple Product</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.randomprocess.ca/2005/09/09/finally-a-semi-good-apple-product/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.randomprocess.ca/2005/09/09/finally-a-semi-good-apple-product/</link>
	<description>NOT just another WordPress weblog. What were they thinking when they came up with that tagline anyways?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 13:45:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://www.randomprocess.ca/2005/09/09/finally-a-semi-good-apple-product/#comment-369</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Sep 2005 14:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.randomprocess.ca/2005/09/09/finally-a-semi-good-apple-product/#comment-369</guid>
		<description>(*shakes head)Apple...&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;that is all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(*shakes head)Apple&#8230;</p>
<p>that is all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rene</title>
		<link>http://www.randomprocess.ca/2005/09/09/finally-a-semi-good-apple-product/#comment-368</link>
		<dc:creator>Rene</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Sep 2005 04:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.randomprocess.ca/2005/09/09/finally-a-semi-good-apple-product/#comment-368</guid>
		<description>Personally, I think the nano is the player the shuffle should have been, but I still think the shuffle is brilliant.&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;The reason it costs so much is because it&#039;s costing apple twice as much to use flash as opposed to hdd&#039;s like the mini used. I really like the nano, but my Color 20GB iPod is still the best of the line IMHO.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally, I think the nano is the player the shuffle should have been, but I still think the shuffle is brilliant.</p>
<p>The reason it costs so much is because it&#8217;s costing apple twice as much to use flash as opposed to hdd&#8217;s like the mini used. I really like the nano, but my Color 20GB iPod is still the best of the line IMHO.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

